This week, we step back from the headlines to focus on where capital is actually flowing. The backdrop remains cross-wired: war headlines, Fed leadership uncertainty, and inflation scares are colliding with one of the most intense AI- driven investment cycles we have seen in years. That matters because indexes can look calm while the gap widens between businesses tied into the AI infrastructure build-out and those more exposed to energy shocks, policy risk, or higher funding costs.
What the Data Is Telling Us
The economy continues to look resilient, though signs of higher-for-longer inflation pressure remain visible.1 This week’s data and macro work pointed to three broad takeaways:
Consumers are still spending, but part of the strength is price, not volume.
March retail sales surprised to the upside, including the key control group, even after adjusting for a big jump in gasoline prices.5 That suggests nominal activity is holding up, but some of it reflects higher energy costs working through the system.
Inflation shocks keep arriving, but long-term expectations remain anchored.
Recent work on the post-pandemic inflation cycle frames this latest oil shock as another transitory inflation shock layered on top of tariffs and past supply disruptions.1 Market-based one-year inflation measures have moved higher, but longer-term expectations and wage dynamics still look more 2020s than 1970s.1
The AI capex cycle is now a macro variable.
AI-related investment is supporting trade, manufacturing, and capital goods demand, with AI infrastructure spending projected at hundreds of billions of dollars annually.1 That investment is partly offsetting some of the drag from higher energy prices and geopolitical uncertainty.
In short: growth is not breaking, but it is being supported by a narrow set of powerful forces, especially AI infrastructure.
What Moved Markets
A few forces shaped market behavior this week:
War headlines and energy prices. Markets spent the week reacting to developments in the Middle East as ceasefire deadlines, shipping risks, and threats around energy infrastructure kept oil volatile.2 Each move in oil now feeds directly into inflation expectations, rate-path debates, and sector rotation.
Fed leadership politics and rate-path uncertainty. The Senate hearing for Kevin Warsh, President Trump’s nominee to succeed Jerome Powell, put Fed independence and the path of policy back in focus. Markets are watching whether the transition introduces more pressure for rapid rate cuts in the face of war-related inflation or reinforces a more cautious stance. So far, pricing still suggests caution rather than panic.
The AI build-out that keeps running in the background. Even as headlines focus on geopolitics, the AI infrastructure story continues to support parts of the equity market.2 Hyperscalers and cloud providers are committing to very large data-center capex, and that spending continues to flow through to semiconductors, memory, networking, power, and select industrials.1 The market remains selective beneath the surface.
Themes in Focus
A few areas stood out in this week’s research:
- AI infrastructure stack. NVIDIA remains central for training, but hyperscalers are increasingly layering in custom silicon and inference-specific solutions through partners like Broadcom and internal TPU development at Google. This is becoming a more multi-layered ecosystem across training, inference, networking, and memory.2
- Agentic AI inside software. Companies like Adobe and Google are pushing agentic AI deeper into customer experience, content, and workflow tools.6 That supports the idea that software will likely be reshaped by AI before it is displaced by it.2
- AI-adjacent industrials, utilities, and energy. The build-out of data centers and compute capacity is benefiting infrastructure-heavy parts of the market beyond semis alone.2 At the same time, traditional energy remains a separate and meaningful macro driver because of war-related supply risks.
- Healthcare as a steadier innovation lane. While AI dominates attention, developments in medtech, diagnostics, and drug platforms continue to matter, especially where innovation is tied to durable end demand rathe than short-term sentiment.2
The Bigger Picture
The bigger picture is still one of uneven leadership and higher dispersion: an AI-driven investment boom is cushioning growth and supporting specific sectors at the same time that war, tariffs, and political risk keep macro uncertainty elevated.2 That tension shows up in the widening spread between AI-linked winners and
more rate- or energy-sensitive areas, as well as in the gap between index performance and what many investors feel underneath the surface.2
This is why attention remains on market internals and breadth, inflation expectations versus wage data, and the sustainability of AI capex versus free cash flow. Right now, the index alone is not telling the full story.
How We’re Thinking About It
This remains a market for selectivity, not blanket optimism or blanket fear. The focus remains on businesses that are critical to the AI infrastructure stack but still grounded in strong balance sheets and cash generation, companies using AI to deepen real competitive advantages, and steadier franchises that can act as ballast alongside higher-volatility growth exposure.
That means staying patient, staying disciplined, and paying close attention to business quality rather than reacting to every macro headline or daily move in AI sentiment.
Closing Thought
This is a market that rewards discipline more than prediction. Index-level stability is masking a widening gap between businesses tied to the AI infrastructure buildout and those more exposed to energy shocks, policy risk, or higher funding costs.
Sources
- BCA Inflation Report, Apr. 17, 2026
- Charles Schwab Think Pipes News, Apr. 22, 2026
- Charles Schwab Market Update, Apr. 21, 2026
- https://www.franklintempleton.com/articles/2026/fixed-income/macro-
views-ai-tailwinds-geopolitical-headwinds - JNJ Q1 2026 Earnings Report, Apr. 23, 2026
Disclosures:
This material is provided for informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. References to specific companies are for illustrative purposes only. The views expressed are based on information believed to be reliable as of the date of publication and are subject to change. Past performance is not indicative of future results. There can be no assurance that any investment strategy or approach discussed will achieve its intended outcome. Beau Morgan Advisors often communicates with clients and prospective clients through electronic mail and other electronic means. We make every effort to ensure that email communications do not contain sensitive information. Please do not send private or sensitive information via email. Beau Morgan Advisors does not accept trading or money movement instructions via email. As a registered investment adviser, email communications may be subject to review by the firm’s Chief Compliance Officer or securities regulators. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete the message.